March 27,2005 OpEd for Edmonton Journal on Air IndiaBy Gurcharan Bhatia and Satya Das
The unresolved search for guilt in the worst mass murder in our country's history leaves uncomfortable questions that affect us all, questions that may be illuminated if not fully addressed in the context of a public inquiry.
The Air India bombing trial told us that our peaceable Canada was unable to gauge the potential for evil within our midst, and to confront that evil with the full powers and instruments at our disposal.
It is necessary to recall the evil that was done -329 people killed on one aircraft, and a similar number of lives spared on another only because it landed first in Japan before its bomb exploded, killing two baggage handlers.
As Canadians who reject hyphenation, labels, or other means of framing us in a stereotype, we are dismayed by the response of some members of the media that this is an "Indo-Canadian community" issue, pitting victims' families against the Canadian state. More...
This sort of division and isolation is antithetical to who we are as Canadians, and the Canadian values to which we all adhere. This is not about one "community," it is about the Canadian community - why and where we failed, and what lessons we can draw from that failure. It is easy and convenient for media to label most of the victims with an ethnic pigeonhole - as though the "Indo-Canadian" label is somehow a dilution of who and what we are as Canadians, as though this label alone is enough to divide and separate us from "unhyphenated" Canadians who don't have such terrible things as mass murder in "their" community. This is tragic, short-sighted and wrong. And it is absolutely no justification for the delusion that this is an ethnically-limited problem to be swept under the rug, or to think that it is simply a question of the families "moving on" or "finding closure" or any of the other means of arguing that we should look the other way while evil prevails, unpunished and unconfronted.
Indeed, an inquiry may shed light on troubling and persistent question:
" After the attack on holiest temple of Sikhs in Amritsar by the Indian Government in 1984, and the subsequent murder of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards, was there any sort of criminal conspiracy in Canada to plot retaliatory measures? What credibility did Canadian authorities give to warnings from the High Commissioner of India of threats to Air India planes? Did Canadian authorities take any steps to stop possible terrorist attacks?
" With tensions within the Canadian Sikh community and among Canadian Sikhs and Hindus -- threats of violence were evident in Vancouver, Toronto and many other cities -- did the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service respond appropriately and adequately? Did they have the means, the resources and the intelligence data required to assess and contain any deleterious consequences? The tensions resulted in the shooting of community newspaper editor Tara Singh Hayer. There was a savage assault on a courageous Vancouver lawyer who dared to say that communal violence has no place in Canada. The lawyer's name was Ujjal Dosanjh, who as Canada's Minister of Health sits today in the federal cabinet that apparently does not see the need for a public inquiry into these matters.
" After the news of Air India plane's disappearance over the Irish sea, what action did the the Canadian government take? Prime Minister Brian Mulroney phoned Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi to offer condolences. Yet nearly everyone on the flight was a Canadian. Did our government fail to accept that Canadians - not Indians - were murdered?
" When did the RCMP and CSIS began their investigation? How much time was lost? How did it come about that crucial evidence apparently was destroyed or disappeared?
" Was there an attitude of "ethnic profiling" in the investigation, with the mass murder of Canadians treated as an "Indian" problem, as evinced in Mulroney's response? Would these agencies and the Canadian Government have taken a different attitude had they fully accepted the fact that this was a Canadian disaster, not something limited to one particular community?
With due respect to the federal government, these are questions we must confront and consider. Particularly in this age of post-2001 security and the use of secretive state power, we need to reaffirm that our Canada is a grand inclusion where the violation of any one citizen's humanity and dignity is the violation of us all.
It is absolutely clear, without pointing fingers at any one arm of government, that we were complacent in the face of evil and 329 of our compatriots paid with their lives. We owe it to ourselves as Canadians to ensure that their sacrifice was not in vain. The search for truth through a public inquiry might not be conclusive, but search we must.
Gurcharan Bhatia, a retired citizenship court judge, and Satya Das, a retired Edmonton Journal editorialist and columnist, were pioneers in defining, advocating and promoting the concept of "Canadian values" in the 1970s and 1980s.